What capitalist propaganda do I repeat? Also trans identities go back for thousands of years before capitalism ever existed. It's not a corporate construct any more than heterosexuality is a corporate construct. I suggest you look deeper into this.
No, none of you understand what you're lobbying for. You never did. How many times do you have to be such an enthusiastic dupe? Stop being a Dunning-Kruger cringe fest.
Ah and here my favourite topic of all of course bio-chemistry :).... That said... Please don´t tell me that it is what I THINK it is..........
....Hahaha omg yup as I feared it was that and worse in fact jesus....
1: This whole amazon virility platform was debunked, hard. It starts with the fact that it is an biological impossibility xD Oh there is so much wrong/impossible with that.... my personal favourite highlight: "sterile babies" xD
If you knew anything about how a human fetus forms out of an embryo you would know that that is ANYTHING but sterile haha, and in fact impossible in a sterile environment. The embryo does need certain bacteria, mainly good ones, present otherwise it won´t form or you will get a defected blob. Maybe whoever wrote that nonsense should have let a bio-chemist check-proof it for such blatant errors first haha xD
So we conclude: Artificialy raising or creating humans is literaly impossible.
2: The only means a male has left to give birth is by an artificial womb... Do you know how this works and what the IMPLICATIONS mean? Not only for the male erm... "mother"?... But also the unborn child too for christs sake that you don´t seem to take into consideration in your endless selfishness at all?:
First the procedure: You need to cut open a males belly... stuff in some womb, pressuring organs excessively... Implant artificial eggs and sperm... let it grow... Now the only way for a male to "give birth" is by vivisection, great... Another cut... So much for the uhm... "male mother"....
Now the problem and complication for the baby: Babies born via vivisection are prone to weaker immune systems, more digestive problems and yes as we noticed that all boil downs too: A worse, weaker and less balanced gut flora. Indeed the natural birth infuses the unborn child with the good gut bacteria of its mother one final time. And this final time is VERY important. Obviously and logicaly, that is not possible and won´t happen in a vivisection.
Congratulations, the child is literaly only A SECOND born and you ALREADY DAMAGED it CHRONICALY/for life.... Do you even care? Very merry congratulations.
Aaaahhh.... How I "love" your type, your "intelligence" but most of all your "endless selflessness and compassion" *pats on the shoulder*
Here, have a medal for all your "selfless compassion" -.-
Trans identities, are corporate consumer synthetic sex identities. Are you trying to tell me that homophobia goes back thousands of years? Is that what you're trying to virtue signal, putting heteronormative veneers of acceptability on gay people? Do you understand you're defending homophobia?
You appear to be educated by corporate NGO, and complete gibberish. You have no idea what you're talking about, and because YOU haven't bothered to look further, you are an inadvertent spokesperson for DNC billionaire donors and BlackRock.
Stop looking to the economic hit man that sold the con, Glenn Greenwald is the perpetrator of this propaganda on the Left, not the answer to it.
Ah old cultures and peoples, one of my favourite topics. Oh someone is emotional... *sigh*
I will say it right away: Using fancy words doesn´t make your argument look any more intellectual nor would it make it any more true. To the actual antropology:
"Are you trying to tell me that homophobia goes back thousands of years?"
Oh I can tell you that for a fact depending on which society and culture you are dealing with. In fact the further you go past the more likely you are going to find matriarch societies, and they tended to be often indeed what we would consider homophobe today. Ironicaly but also logicaly speaking, homosexuality saw most of its acceptance often in the more later emerging patriarch societies. And even in those there was no guarentee. Bushido developed later on in South-East Asian culture for example. And with the arrival of modern fire weapons and downfall of the warrior cultures this reversed backwards again in many places too.
The Zulus for example, as far as their records go back, would have never had homosexuality and forced/festive marriage(hetero logicaly speaking) was always integral part of their societies system. Well, up until today I guess where many Zulu live a different lifestyle of course.
Islam on an interesting note actualy did not have homosexuality forbidden before western/christian influence in early 1900, a dirty little secret of "The Garden". Still we have 1 culture, and for each there is a counterexample as I should have made clear by now.
So no, claiming all of mankinds cultures were accepting of homosexuality is absolute BS and wishful thinking. I am also not sure what you are trying to achieve with that.
These are things I can tell you for a fact, and hey I haven´t written any of this hahaha, only studied it. I´m only the messenger here, as for the writers... I fear they are long dead though haha xD
All you ever do is repeat capitalist propaganda, trans identities are a corporate construct. https://youtu.be/1eWZvT3y3BU
What capitalist propaganda do I repeat? Also trans identities go back for thousands of years before capitalism ever existed. It's not a corporate construct any more than heterosexuality is a corporate construct. I suggest you look deeper into this.
No, none of you understand what you're lobbying for. You never did. How many times do you have to be such an enthusiastic dupe? Stop being a Dunning-Kruger cringe fest.
https://humanevents.com/2023/06/11/jennifer-bilek-is-humanity-ready-for-lgbtq-tech-babies-and-the-full-erasure-of-women-from-reproduction
Ah and here my favourite topic of all of course bio-chemistry :).... That said... Please don´t tell me that it is what I THINK it is..........
....Hahaha omg yup as I feared it was that and worse in fact jesus....
1: This whole amazon virility platform was debunked, hard. It starts with the fact that it is an biological impossibility xD Oh there is so much wrong/impossible with that.... my personal favourite highlight: "sterile babies" xD
If you knew anything about how a human fetus forms out of an embryo you would know that that is ANYTHING but sterile haha, and in fact impossible in a sterile environment. The embryo does need certain bacteria, mainly good ones, present otherwise it won´t form or you will get a defected blob. Maybe whoever wrote that nonsense should have let a bio-chemist check-proof it for such blatant errors first haha xD
So we conclude: Artificialy raising or creating humans is literaly impossible.
2: The only means a male has left to give birth is by an artificial womb... Do you know how this works and what the IMPLICATIONS mean? Not only for the male erm... "mother"?... But also the unborn child too for christs sake that you don´t seem to take into consideration in your endless selfishness at all?:
First the procedure: You need to cut open a males belly... stuff in some womb, pressuring organs excessively... Implant artificial eggs and sperm... let it grow... Now the only way for a male to "give birth" is by vivisection, great... Another cut... So much for the uhm... "male mother"....
Now the problem and complication for the baby: Babies born via vivisection are prone to weaker immune systems, more digestive problems and yes as we noticed that all boil downs too: A worse, weaker and less balanced gut flora. Indeed the natural birth infuses the unborn child with the good gut bacteria of its mother one final time. And this final time is VERY important. Obviously and logicaly, that is not possible and won´t happen in a vivisection.
Congratulations, the child is literaly only A SECOND born and you ALREADY DAMAGED it CHRONICALY/for life.... Do you even care? Very merry congratulations.
Aaaahhh.... How I "love" your type, your "intelligence" but most of all your "endless selflessness and compassion" *pats on the shoulder*
Here, have a medal for all your "selfless compassion" -.-
Trans identities, are corporate consumer synthetic sex identities. Are you trying to tell me that homophobia goes back thousands of years? Is that what you're trying to virtue signal, putting heteronormative veneers of acceptability on gay people? Do you understand you're defending homophobia?
You appear to be educated by corporate NGO, and complete gibberish. You have no idea what you're talking about, and because YOU haven't bothered to look further, you are an inadvertent spokesperson for DNC billionaire donors and BlackRock.
Stop looking to the economic hit man that sold the con, Glenn Greenwald is the perpetrator of this propaganda on the Left, not the answer to it.
Ah old cultures and peoples, one of my favourite topics. Oh someone is emotional... *sigh*
I will say it right away: Using fancy words doesn´t make your argument look any more intellectual nor would it make it any more true. To the actual antropology:
"Are you trying to tell me that homophobia goes back thousands of years?"
Oh I can tell you that for a fact depending on which society and culture you are dealing with. In fact the further you go past the more likely you are going to find matriarch societies, and they tended to be often indeed what we would consider homophobe today. Ironicaly but also logicaly speaking, homosexuality saw most of its acceptance often in the more later emerging patriarch societies. And even in those there was no guarentee. Bushido developed later on in South-East Asian culture for example. And with the arrival of modern fire weapons and downfall of the warrior cultures this reversed backwards again in many places too.
The Zulus for example, as far as their records go back, would have never had homosexuality and forced/festive marriage(hetero logicaly speaking) was always integral part of their societies system. Well, up until today I guess where many Zulu live a different lifestyle of course.
Islam on an interesting note actualy did not have homosexuality forbidden before western/christian influence in early 1900, a dirty little secret of "The Garden". Still we have 1 culture, and for each there is a counterexample as I should have made clear by now.
So no, claiming all of mankinds cultures were accepting of homosexuality is absolute BS and wishful thinking. I am also not sure what you are trying to achieve with that.
These are things I can tell you for a fact, and hey I haven´t written any of this hahaha, only studied it. I´m only the messenger here, as for the writers... I fear they are long dead though haha xD